Only once in a blue moon do nonprofit leaders actually have the budget to hire full-time IT management roles. Roles like a Chief Information Officer or Chief Technology Officer who make the important decisions around the technology your organization uses. Usually, these responsibilities fall in the laps of line staff.
When this happens, it can go one of two ways. One way sees selected staff as enthusiastic adopters of the technology. They buy-in to the technology and learn it well enough to become evangelists who get the rest of the staff on board. They implement input structure and ultimately manage the technology that steers your digital ship. The other way is unfortunately a lot more common. The selected staff doesn’t have a say in the tech that is purchased. It becomes a challenge to implement and adopt the technology on top of their already-demanding workload. This result pushes you further away from achieving your organization’s mission.
If your organization is constantly trying new technology or suffering from burned-out staff, it is not a coincidence. You need to shift the culture and empowerment around IT decision-making. This shift is about giving full voice to the needs across an organization that any given technology solution is attempting to address.
When it comes to the technology that keeps your mission moving, how is your staff doing? No, how are they really doing? Do you have a system in place where they are encouraged to talk about their experiences with the technology they use? It’s not uncommon for nonprofit leaders to falsely believe they have their finger on the pulse.
A lot of times, this can have a detrimental effect on the ability of your organization to complete its mission.
A frustrated staff member who doesn’t have a way to voice their concerns can knowingly, or unknowingly, throw off the data they enter.
Data leads to insights that impact long-term goals. If you’ve experienced technology implementation failures, you may ask yourself what went so wrong. Have you ever considered that the key to preventing implementation failure lies in your staff, and not the technology?
When you implement change that focuses on the people first, you begin to see cracks in the system before they spread into fractures that swallow everything whole. This fracture phenomenon can be prevented by creating an outlet that allows for consistently candid feedback.
Providing staff a reporting mechanism that gives grease to the squeaky wheels (or silent wheels, as it were) works wonders to mitigate staff burnout and improve morale.
Giving voice to complaints, concerns, and ideas often reveals a-ha moments that can steer progress back in the right direction or pinpoint areas to address. A transparent structure for discussing staff’s needs, why they haven't been met, and how to get them met is crucial to successful technology implementation.
By virtue of creating an accountability structure, tensions between staff and executives ease, making way for a better work environment. Not to mention, better adoption of your technology and ultimately achieving your nonprofit’s mission.
To implement your own feedback structure, here’s what you should put into practice:
As a nonprofit leader, if you have ever wondered why progress wasn’t happening, or why the data just wasn’t right you maybe didn’t think to start with talking about it with your staff. Now that you know how to start getting their honest thoughts about the tech they use, you can confidently go forward with a plan.
But a feedback structure isn’t only good for your staff’s stress. Beyond finding solutions for common problems, you’ll see numerous, long-lasting benefits for you and your organization’s mission. Such as:
A satisfied staff is one that knows they’re being heard and has agency in decision-making that directly impacts them. Implementing a solid feedback system to ensure transparency, accountability, and action between staff and leadership forms stronger relationships that pave the way for long-term success.